Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HTT · against 102 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #39 of 103 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including HTT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HTT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 83 reported | 0.14× | 0.53× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 97 reported | 1.29 | 0.59 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 100 reported | 5.75× | 2.24× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 35 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 75 | 58 | |
| 36 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 73 | 55 | |
| 37 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 73 | 59 | |
| 38 | 465M USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 39 | 276M USD | 71 | 40 | |
| 40 | 3.6B HKD (≈$461M) | 70 | 61 | |
| 41 | 434M USD | 68 | 43 | |
| 42 | 8.4B THB (≈$234M) | 67 | 60 | |
| 43 | 190M USD | 67 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score