Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOAH · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #112 of 399 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 72
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including NOAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.01× | 0.57× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.81 | 0.67 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 3.60× | 2.04× | 65% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 108 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 73 | ||
| 109 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 73 | 55 | |
| 110 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 73 | 59 | |
| 111 | 8.4B USD | 72 | 63 | |
| 112 | 465M USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 113 | 1.25T CLP (≈$1.4B) | 72 | ||
| 114 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 72 | 59 | |
| 115 | 276M USD | 71 | 40 | |
| 116 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 71 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score