Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BANX · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #134 of 399 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including BANX · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta and debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BANX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.20× | 0.57× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.29 | 0.67 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 1.44× | 2.04× | 36% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 130 | 19.0B CAD (≈$13.9B) | 68 | 60 | |
| 131 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.4B THB (≈$234M) |
| 67 |
| 60 |
| 132 | 14.1B USD | 67 | 57 |
| 133 | 641M USD | 67 | 74 |
| 134 | 190M USD | 67 | 67 |
| 135 | 13.1B AUD (≈$8.6B) | 66 | 55 |
| 136 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 66 | 68 |
| 137 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 66 | 57 |
| 138 | 155.0B INR (≈$1.9B) | 66 |