Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ArrowMark Financial Corp.
How ArrowMark Financial Corp. stacks up
BANX · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #95 of 367 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including BANX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.2% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 92% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 38.5% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BANX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BANX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 6.2% | 7.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 5.1% | 9.9% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 38.5% | 10.0% | 92% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BANX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 91 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 75 | 60 | |
| 91 | 4.0B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 91 | 57.9B MXN (≈$3.1B) | 75 | ||
| 91 | 15.1B USD | 75 | 49 | |
| 95 | 190M USD | 74 | 67 | |
| 95 | 4.3B USD | 74 | 70 | |
| 95 | 3.0B USD | 74 | 52 | |
| 98 | 9.6B USD | 73 | 73 | |
| 98 | 82M USD | 73 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score