Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HRZN · against 96 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #32 of 97 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including HRZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HRZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 79 reported | 0.96× | 0.53× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 90 reported | 0.98 | 0.59 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 95 reported | 7.45× | 2.26× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 28 | 370M USD | 79 | 85 | |
| 29 | 2.4B SEK (≈$242M) | 79 | ||
| 30 | 350M USD | 78 | ||
| 31 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 78 | 23 | |
| 32 | 259M USD | 77 | 71 | |
| 33 | 157M USD | 75 | 79 | |
| 34 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 73 | 55 | |
| 35 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 73 | 59 | |
| 36 | 465M USD | 72 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score