Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthEquity, Inc.
How HealthEquity, Inc. stacks up
HQY · against 179 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #81 of 180 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HQY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HQY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HQY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 2.7% | 2.6% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | 5.6% | 4.8% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 5.2% | 1.7% | 81% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 23.5% | 19.9% | 54% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HQY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 5 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 76 | |
| 76 | 5.3B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 78 | 35.1B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 58 | 56 | |
| 78 | 7.4B USD | 58 | 67 | |
| 78 | 12.6B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 81 | 8.4B USD | 57 | 67 | |
| 82 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 56 | 45 | |
| 83 | 548.2B INR (≈$6.6B) | 55 | 68 | |
| 83 | 414.8B INR (≈$5.0B) | 55 | 73 | |
| 83 | 1.13T INR (≈$13.5B) | 55 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score