Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Smith & Nephew plc
How Smith & Nephew plc stacks up
SNN · against 1,336 other Healthcare companies
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #556 of 1,337 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score133 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SNN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 4.0%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.7% vs peer median 0.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SNN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SNN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,287 reported | 4.9% | 1.5% | 77% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,357 reported | 2.2% | 4.2% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 711 reported | Not reported | -1.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,306 reported | 8.1% | 37.9% | 13% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SNN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 556 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 58 | 51 | |
| 556 | 58.6B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 556 | 641.4B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 556 | 7.4B USD | 58 | 67 | |
| 556 | 12.6B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 556 | 2.2B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 569 | 5.24T KRW (≈$3.8B) | 57 | 60 | |
| 569 | 2.0B CNY (≈$286M) | 57 | 43 | |
| 569 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 57 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score