Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthEquity, Inc.
How HealthEquity, Inc. stacks up
HQY · against 1,336 other Healthcare companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #569 of 1,337 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score133 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HQY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HQY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HQY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,287 reported | 2.7% | 1.5% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,357 reported | 5.6% | 4.2% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 711 reported | 5.2% | -1.0% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,306 reported | 23.5% | 37.9% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HQY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 569 | 1.8B USD | 57 | 52 | |
| 569 | 2.9B USD | 57 | 50 | |
| 569 | 54.0B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 569 | 31.3B USD | 57 | 63 | |
| 569 | 8.4B USD | 57 | 67 | |
| 569 | 549M EUR (≈$604M) | 57 | 56 | |
| 569 | 41.9B SEK (≈$4.2B) | 57 | 53 | |
| 569 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 57 | 80 | |
| 569 | 1.1B CAD (≈$774M) | 57 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score