Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HMH · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #11 of 32 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 80
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including HMH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HMH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 31 reported | 0.29× | 0.44× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 29 reported | Not reported | 0.55 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 33 reported | 2.97× | 1.53× | 75% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 3 | 265M GBP (≈$344M) | 93 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.9B CNY (≈$272M) | 93 | 35 | |
| 5 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 90 | 73 | |
| 7 | 261M USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 8 | 846M HKD (≈$108M) | 85 | 32 | |
| 9 | 328M USD | 84 | 54 | |
| 10 | 153M GBP (≈$200M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 11 | 199M USD | 80 | 57 | |
| 12 | 316M USD | 79 | 65 | |
| 13 | 104M USD | 73 | 33 | |
| 14 | 290M USD | 72 | 34 | |
| 15 | 538M MYR (≈$118M) | 64 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score