Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HDL · against 619 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #224 of 620 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)73 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including HDL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HDL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 600 reported | 0.59× | 0.42× | 40% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 607 reported | 0.55 | 0.48 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 605 reported | 2.50× | 1.56× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49.3B JPY (≈$336M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 16.5B TWD (≈$513M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 3 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2.5B CNY (≈$357M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 5 | 17.5B THB (≈$489M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 220 | 4.9B CNY (≈$689M) | 71 | 51 | |
| 221 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 299M USD |
| 71 |
| 82 |
| 222 | 114.5B JPY (≈$778M) | 71 | 78 |
| 223 | 6.0B CNY (≈$845M) | 71 | 63 |
| 224 | 582M USD | 71 | 63 |
| 225 | 14.8B TWD (≈$459M) | 71 | 44 |
| 226 | 2.6B CNY (≈$359M) | 70 | 36 |
| 227 | 395M USD | 70 | 40 |
| 228 | 2.2B CNY (≈$311M) | 70 | 35 |