Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDRO · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #472 of 1,585 · scores higher than 70% of peers · safety percentile 70
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including CDRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.05× | 0.50× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.46 | 0.56 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.47× | 1.48× | 50% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 468 | 14.8B TWD (≈$459M) | 71 | 44 | |
| 469 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.2B SEK (≈$1.3B) |
| 70 |
| 78 |
| 470 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 70 | 73 |
| 471 | 2.6B CNY (≈$359M) | 70 | 36 |
| 472 | 395M USD | 70 | 40 |
| 473 | 2.2B CNY (≈$311M) | 70 | 35 |
| 474 | 2.0B TWD (≈$63M) | 70 | 34 |
| 475 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 70 | 60 |
| 476 | 230M MYR (≈$51M) | 70 | 66 |