Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Codere Online Luxembourg, S.A.
How Codere Online Luxembourg, S.A. stacks up
CDRO · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,180 of 1,604 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including CDRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 74% of peers. Operating margin: 2.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on assets: 1.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | Not reported | 7.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 2.7% | 6.4% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 1.6% | 3.3% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 34.0% | 7.7% | 94% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 85.4% | 30.2% | 99% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,180 | 41.4B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 26 | |
| 1,180 | 24.5B JPY (≈$166M) | 26 | 54 | |
| 1,180 | 568M AUD (≈$375M) | 26 | 35 | |
| 1,180 | 2.4B USD | 26 | 47 | |
| 1,180 | 395M USD | 26 | 40 | |
| 1,180 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.1B) | 26 | 49 | |
| 1,180 | 36.3B USD | 26 | 49 | |
| 1,180 | 93M EUR (≈$102M) | 26 | 17 | |
| 1,180 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 26 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score