Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hayward Holdings, Inc.
How Hayward Holdings, Inc. stacks up
HAYW · against 555 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #284 of 556 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score71 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HAYW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAYW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAYW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 551 reported | 4.4% | 4.4% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 561 reported | 7.6% | 7.8% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 5.8% | 4.3% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 551 reported | 45.4% | 42.2% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAYW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 278 | 4.7B EUR (≈$5.1B) | 55 | 60 | |
| 278 | 5.3B USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 278 | 103.1B TRY (≈$3.1B) | 55 | 46 | |
| 284 | 19.5B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 54 | 51 | |
| 284 | 3.5B USD | 54 | 63 | |
| 284 | 18.6B SEK (≈$1.9B) | 54 | 36 | |
| 284 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.8B) | 54 | 62 | |
| 288 | 210.0B TWD (≈$6.5B) | 53 | 73 | |
| 288 | 25.0B MYR (≈$5.5B) | 53 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score