Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hayward Holdings, Inc.
How Hayward Holdings, Inc. stacks up
HAYW · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,090 of 2,394 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HAYW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAYW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAYW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 4.4% | 3.8% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 7.6% | 7.0% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 5.8% | 3.7% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 45.4% | 50.5% | 45% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAYW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,090 | 7.3B USD | 54 | 72 | |
| 1,090 | 15.4B USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 1,090 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 70 | |
| 1,090 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 54 | 43 | |
| 1,090 | 3.5B USD | 54 | 63 | |
| 1,090 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.8B) | 54 | 57 | |
| 1,090 | 773M AUD (≈$510M) | 54 | 73 | |
| 1,090 | 18.6B SEK (≈$1.9B) | 54 | 36 | |
| 1,090 | 7.1B DKK (≈$1.1B) | 54 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score