Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HAS · against 130 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #120 of 131 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including HAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 129 reported | 5.31× | 0.70× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 132 reported | 0.44 | 0.86 | 80% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 1.66× | 1.49× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 116 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 13 | 41 | |
| 117 | 17.5B USD | 12 | 18 | |
| 118 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 12 | 51 | |
| 119 | 8.9B USD | 12 | 53 | |
| 120 | 16.6B USD | 10 | 58 | |
| 121 | 24.8B USD | 7 | 64 | |
| 122 | 24.1B USD | 6 | 63 | |
| 123 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 6 | 38 | |
| 124 | 10.2B USD | 5 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score