Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HALO · against 133 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #126 of 134 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 8
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including HALO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HALO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 126 reported | 15.18× | 0.34× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 133 reported | 0.88 | 0.66 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 2.71× | 2.24× | 60% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 2 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 3 | 10.2B USD | 97 | ||
| 4 | 9.8B USD | 96 | ||
| 5 | 8.8B USD | 94 | 50 | |
| 122 | 77.1B DKK (≈$11.6B) | 11 | 47 | |
| 123 | 8.4B USD | 10 | 28 | |
| 124 | 68.0B BRL (≈$12.2B) | 10 | 67 | |
| 125 | 12.7B AUD (≈$8.4B) | 10 | 38 | |
| 126 | 14.6B USD | 8 | 59 | |
| 127 | 11.6B USD | 6 | 57 | |
| 128 | 8.8B USD | 6 | 31 | |
| 129 | 7.3B USD | 6 | 32 | |
| 130 | 23.5B USD | 5 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score