Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
H · against 127 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #112 of 128 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including H · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | H | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 126 reported | 1.24× | 0.71× | 30% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 129 reported | 1.40 | 0.82 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 124 reported | 0.62× | 1.47× | 2% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 108 | 13.7B USD | 14 | 54 | |
| 109 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 13 | 41 | |
| 110 | 9.4B USD | 13 | 55 | |
| 111 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 13 | 41 | |
| 112 | 17.5B USD | 12 | 18 | |
| 113 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 12 | 51 | |
| 114 | 8.9B USD | 12 | 53 | |
| 115 | 16.6B USD | 10 | 58 | |
| 116 | 34.0B USD | 9 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score