Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GXO Logistics, Inc.
How GXO Logistics, Inc. stacks up
GXO · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #160 of 473 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GXO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.7% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GXO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GXO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 2.2% | 3.0% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 8.3% | 6.3% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.0% | 3.3% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 50.0% | 32.3% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GXO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 154 | 940M USD | 53 | 46 | |
| 160 | 4.9B USD | 52 | 78 | |
| 160 | 904M USD | 52 | 27 | |
| 160 | 101.3B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 160 | 6.0B USD | 52 | 43 | |
| 160 | 382M USD | 52 | 79 | |
| 160 | 147.5B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 160 | 270M USD | 52 | 41 | |
| 167 | 896M USD | 51 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score