Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aebi Schmidt Holding AG
How Aebi Schmidt Holding AG stacks up
AEBI · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,162 of 2,394 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AEBI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield and earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.4% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AEBI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AEBI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 2.7% | 3.8% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 9.2% | 7.0% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 0.7% | 3.7% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 92.4% | 50.5% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AEBI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,162 | 483.7B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 51 | 47 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score