Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
How The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company stacks up
GT · against 495 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #235 of 496 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -198.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 491 reported | -198.9% | 4.7% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | 11.2% | 9.0% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 15.0% | 6.9% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 494 reported | 222.3% | 56.1% | 97% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 227 | 2.3B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 227 | 147.5B INR (≈$1.8B) | 55 | 57 | |
| 235 | 6.1B CNY (≈$854M) | 54 | 41 | |
| 235 | 205.2B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 54 | 54 | |
| 235 | 1.3B USD | 54 | 22 | |
| 235 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 54 | 36 | |
| 235 | 615.5B CLP (≈$677M) | 54 | 37 | |
| 235 | 7.3B SEK (≈$734M) | 54 | 58 | |
| 241 | 6.7B CNY (≈$932M) | 53 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score