Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GOOD · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #666 of 751 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including GOOD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GOOD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 2.62× | 0.82× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.07 | 0.69 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.82× | 1.20× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 662 | 4.2B USD | 12 | 18 | |
| 663 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.5B USD |
| 12 |
| 47 |
| 664 | 7.9B SEK (≈$795M) | 12 | 56 |
| 665 | 473M CAD (≈$345M) | 11 | 37 |
| 666 | 563M USD | 11 | 45 |
| 667 | 2.6B SEK (≈$257M) | 11 | 53 |
| 668 | 684.5B KRW (≈$493M) | 11 |
| 669 | 7.2B SEK (≈$720M) | 11 | 56 |
| 670 | 19.56T IDR (≈$1.2B) | 11 | 63 |