Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
How Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. stacks up
GLPI · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #129 of 731 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including GLPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLPI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 5.8% | 3.0% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 2.8% | 11.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 6.2% | 3.8% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLPI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 129 | 3.5B CNY (≈$492M) | 82 | 70 | |
| 129 | 2.8B USD | 82 | 68 | |
| 129 | 374M USD | 82 | 66 | |
| 129 | 7.1B CAD (≈$5.2B) | 82 | 37 | |
| 129 | 11.7B USD | 82 | 80 | |
| 129 | 502.9B INR (≈$6.0B) | 82 | 39 | |
| 129 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.9B) | 82 | 64 | |
| 137 | 184M MYR (≈$40M) | 81 | 78 | |
| 137 | 3.3B CNY (≈$467M) | 81 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score