Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acadia Realty Trust
How Acadia Realty Trust stacks up
AKR · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #129 of 731 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including AKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AKR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 4.7% | 3.0% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -47.4% | 11.1% | 11% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 6.7% | 3.8% | 61% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AKR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 122 | 859M USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 122 | 7.3B USD | 83 | 58 | |
| 129 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 82 | 80 | |
| 129 | 3.5B CNY (≈$492M) | 82 | 70 | |
| 129 | 2.8B USD | 82 | 68 | |
| 129 | 374M USD | 82 | 66 | |
| 129 | 7.1B CAD (≈$5.2B) | 82 | 37 | |
| 129 | 11.7B USD | 82 | 80 | |
| 129 | 502.9B INR (≈$6.0B) | 82 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score