Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Capital Corporation
How Gladstone Capital Corporation stacks up
GLAD · against 76 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #39 of 77 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GLAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -34.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.1% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 11.1% | 5.0% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | Not reported | 8.2% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | -34.8% | 11.5% | 4% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 112.3% | 110.7% | 53% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 34 | 566M USD | 66 | 75 | |
| 36 | 1.3B MYR (≈$289M) | 65 | 49 | |
| 37 | 453M EUR (≈$499M) | 64 | 39 | |
| 38 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 63 | 67 | |
| 39 | 433M USD | 61 | 46 | |
| 40 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 60 | 61 | |
| 41 | 538M USD | 59 | 43 | |
| 41 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 59 | 55 | |
| 43 | 773M USD | 58 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score