Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to StealthGas Inc.
How StealthGas Inc. stacks up
GASS · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,453 of 2,400 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including GASS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GASS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GASS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 3.5% | 4.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -13.5% | 7.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.3% | 4.2% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GASS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,453 | 263M EUR (≈$289M) | 39 | 60 | |
| 1,453 | 1.2B USD | 39 | 28 | |
| 1,453 | 321M USD | 39 | 12 | |
| 1,453 | 75.7B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 1,453 | 323M USD | 39 | 82 | |
| 1,453 | 278M EUR (≈$306M) | 39 | 74 | |
| 1,453 | 97.3B SEK (≈$9.7B) | 39 | 43 | |
| 1,453 | 9.1B GBP (≈$11.8B) | 39 | 47 | |
| 1,453 | 81.6B USD | 39 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score