Ranked #187 of 251 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 31
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
17 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including FVR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 31 among Real Estate companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 83% of peers. Beta: 1.18 vs peer median 0.75
●Current ratio is close to the peer norm. Current ratio: 1.04× vs peer median 1.20×
▲less borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: stronger than 64% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.75× vs peer median 0.80×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FVR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
