Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FUN · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,475 of 1,585 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including FUN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FUN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 14.55× | 0.50× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.45 | 0.56 | 61% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 0.42× | 1.48× | 3% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,471 | 72.8B USD | 7 | 50 | |
| 1,472 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) |
| 7 |
| 10 |
| 1,473 | 151M EUR (≈$166M) | 7 | 8 |
| 1,474 | 4.4B USD | 7 | 49 |
| 1,475 | 763M USD | 7 | 19 |
| 1,476 | 4.2B USD | 7 | 56 |
| 1,477 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 7 | 36 |
| 1,478 | 5.6B HKD (≈$711M) | 7 | 49 |
| 1,479 | 5.4B USD | 7 | 46 |