Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FTV · against 157 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #108 of 158 · scores higher than 32% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)22 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including FTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 150 reported | 0.59× | 0.34× | 36% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 152 reported | 0.99 | 1.09 | 56% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 157 reported | 1.24× | 1.61× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 104 | 4.52T JPY (≈$30.8B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 105 | 431.5B TWD (≈$13.4B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 106 | 32.8B USD | 28 | 66 | |
| 107 | 491.0B TWD (≈$15.2B) | 28 | 41 | |
| 108 | 20.2B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 109 | 92.8B HKD (≈$11.9B) | 27 | 43 | |
| 110 | 102.7B HKD (≈$13.1B) | 27 | 60 | |
| 111 | 15.3B USD | 27 | 37 | |
| 112 | 150.4B CNY (≈$21.1B) | 26 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score