Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Frontline plc
How Frontline plc stacks up
FRO · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 194 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including FRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 12.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.7% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | 12.7% | 5.2% | 87% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 12.0% | 11.9% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 5.9% | 5.9% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 27.0% | 50.6% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 48 | 297.1B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 52 | 3.6B USD | 68 | 77 | |
| 53 | 3.7B USD | 66 | 67 | |
| 53 | 4.3B USD | 66 | 47 | |
| 53 | 11.7B USD | 66 | 71 | |
| 53 | 674M USD | 66 | 45 | |
| 57 | 204.7B USD | 65 | 44 | |
| 57 | 17.6B USD | 65 | 31 | |
| 59 | 4.1B USD | 63 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score