Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FPI · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #305 of 751 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including FPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.48× | 0.82× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.70 | 0.69 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.02× | 1.20× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 301 | 43.0B THB (≈$1.2B) | 60 | 65 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 302 |
| 530M MYR (≈$117M) |
| 60 |
| 81 |
| 303 | 562M EUR (≈$618M) | 60 | 38 |
| 304 | 540M SGD (≈$410M) | 60 | 77 |
| 305 | 384M USD | 59 | 43 |
| 306 | 2.5B MYR (≈$545M) | 59 | 47 |
| 307 | 2.2B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 59 | 61 |
| 308 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 59 | 49 |
| 309 | 472M HKD (≈$60M) | 59 | 78 |