Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fluor Corporation
How Fluor Corporation stacks up
FLR · against 421 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #412 of 422 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including FLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -31.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -3.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 413 reported | -24.8% | 4.2% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 425 reported | -5.1% | 7.7% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | -5.1% | 4.0% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 412 reported | 41.3% | 38.2% | 55% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 3 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 5 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 410 | 4.9B USD | 12 | 32 | |
| 412 | 47.5B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 9 | 65 | |
| 412 | 6.3B USD | 9 | 47 | |
| 412 | 5.7B USD | 9 | 36 | |
| 412 | 6.4B USD | 9 | 17 | |
| 412 | 3.4B USD | 9 | 16 | |
| 412 | 4.8B USD | 9 | 46 | |
| 412 | 6.4B USD | 9 | 43 | |
| 419 | 5.41T KRW (≈$3.9B) | 8 | 17 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score