Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PL · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #2,095 of 2,394 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score197 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including PL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | PL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | -8.1% | 3.8% | 8% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | -1.1% | 7.0% | 10% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 0.4% | 3.7% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 9.2% | 50.5% | 6% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 2,095 | 3.6B CNY (≈$510M) | 12 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 29 |
| 2,095 | 28M MYR (≈$6M) | 12 | 47 |
| 2,095 | 714M USD | 12 | 43 |
| 2,095 | 725M USD | 12 | 46 |
| 2,095 | 4.9B USD | 12 | 32 |
| 2,095 | 293M EUR (≈$322M) | 12 | 17 |
| 2,095 | 8.13T IDR (≈$504M) | 12 | 7 |
| 2,119 | 5.0B CNY (≈$706M) | 11 | 55 |
| 2,119 | 3.5B CNY (≈$487M) | 11 | 34 |