Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flowco Holdings Inc.
How Flowco Holdings Inc. stacks up
FLOC · against 125 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #60 of 126 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FLOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.6% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.9% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 6.5% | 5.6% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 126 reported | 15.1% | 12.8% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 9.9% | 6.0% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 43.1% | 59.4% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLOC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.6B THB (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 54 | 2.4B USD | 53 | 39 | |
| 54 | 2.1B USD | 53 | 58 | |
| 58 | 3.3B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 58 | 1.3B USD | 51 | 53 | |
| 60 | 2.1B USD | 50 | 65 | |
| 61 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 50 | |
| 61 | 2.1B USD | 49 | 76 | |
| 61 | 1.14T CLP (≈$1.3B) | 49 | 58 | |
| 61 | 4.1B USD | 49 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score