Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FIS · against 158 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #134 of 159 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including FIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 151 reported | 1.33× | 0.34× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 153 reported | 0.83 | 1.09 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 158 reported | 0.54× | 1.62× | 2% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 130 | 11.9B USD | 14 | 50 | |
| 131 | 19.0B USD | 13 | 54 | |
| 132 | 32.5B USD | 13 | 43 | |
| 133 | 15.6B USD | 12 | 48 | |
| 134 | 20.1B USD | 12 | 68 | |
| 135 | 361.8B TWD (≈$11.2B) | 12 | 32 | |
| 136 | 10.6B USD | 11 | 50 | |
| 137 | 1.28T TWD (≈$39.6B) | 10 | 59 | |
| 138 | 12.4B USD | 10 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score