Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZBRA · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,489 of 1,698 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ZBRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZBRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.86× | 0.26× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.61 | 0.84 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.52× | 1.83× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,485 | 365M EUR (≈$401M) | 13 | 38 | |
| 1,486 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.4B USD |
| 12 |
| 39 |
| 1,487 | 625.5B KRW (≈$450M) | 12 | 23 |
| 1,488 | 348M USD | 12 | 22 |
| 1,489 | 15.6B USD | 12 | 48 |
| 1,490 | 2.5B CNY (≈$356M) | 12 | 36 |
| 1,491 | 519M USD | 12 | 29 |
| 1,492 | 52.7B USD | 12 | 61 |
| 1,493 | 20.1B USD | 12 | 68 |