Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FinVolution Group
How FinVolution Group stacks up
FINV · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #113 of 154 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including FINV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 7.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.1% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FINV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FINV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 3.9% | 10.5% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 6.1% | 11.4% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 6.8% | 11.5% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FINV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 109 | 11.8B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 110 | 353M USD | 39 | 59 | |
| 110 | 97.2B USD | 39 | 44 | |
| 112 | 748M USD | 38 | 35 | |
| 113 | 685M USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 114 | 14.1B USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 115 | 13.7B USD | 35 | 42 | |
| 115 | 38.4B USD | 35 | 22 | |
| 117 | 3.8B USD | 34 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score