Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FBRT · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #288 of 751 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 62
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including FBRT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FBRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 2.73× | 0.82× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.14 | 0.69 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 5.18× | 1.20× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 284 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 62 | 57 | |
| 285 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 30.4B TWD (≈$941M) |
| 62 |
| 82 |
| 286 | 174.7B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 62 | 46 |
| 287 | 37.8B THB (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 62 |
| 288 | 468M USD | 62 | 50 |
| 289 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 62 | 61 |
| 290 | 795M USD | 61 | 48 |
| 291 | 1.4B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 61 | 57 |
| 292 | 188.6B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 61 | 62 |