Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National Vision Holdings, Inc.
How National Vision Holdings, Inc. stacks up
EYE · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #144 of 356 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including EYE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 11.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EYE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EYE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 3.7% | 4.3% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 9.3% | 8.4% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 3.7% | 5.3% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 67.6% | 35.8% | 71% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EYE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 138 | 45M USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 138 | 24.1B USD | 53 | 63 | |
| 138 | 3.3B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 144 | 4.6B USD | 52 | 80 | |
| 144 | 1.3B USD | 52 | 51 | |
| 144 | 4.0B USD | 52 | 36 | |
| 144 | 931M USD | 52 | 44 | |
| 148 | 6.8B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 148 | 3.5B USD | 51 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score