Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expedia Group, Inc.
How Expedia Group, Inc. stacks up
EXPE · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #250 of 1,604 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including EXPE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 81% of peers. Return on assets: 7.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 85% of peers. Operating margin: 16.0% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | Not reported | 7.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 16.0% | 6.4% | 85% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 7.0% | 3.3% | 81% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 89.5% | 7.7% | 99% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 90.4% | 30.2% | 99% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 250 | 28.4B EUR (≈$31.3B) | 84 | 59 | |
| 250 | 2.4B USD | 84 | 81 | |
| 250 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 84 | 55 | |
| 250 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 84 | 58 | |
| 250 | 34.3B USD | 84 | 60 | |
| 250 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 84 | 55 | |
| 250 | 8.2B AUD (≈$5.4B) | 84 | 58 | |
| 250 | 8.8B USD | 84 | 55 | |
| 250 | 1.5B USD | 84 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score