Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Evergy, Inc.
How Evergy, Inc. stacks up
EVRG · against 61 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #27 of 62 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including EVRG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.1% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVRG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVRG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 62 reported | 4.6% | 4.7% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 62 reported | 7.8% | 7.6% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 35 reported | -7.1% | -4.4% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | 51.9% | 47.6% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVRG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.6B USD | 93 | 57 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 91 | 66 | |
| 3 | 96.4B HKD (≈$12.3B) | 87 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.7B) | 83 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 23 | 27.3B USD | 48 | 39 | |
| 25 | 13.1B USD | 47 | 46 | |
| 25 | 24.1B EUR (≈$26.6B) | 47 | 57 | |
| 27 | 29.7B USD | 46 | 57 | |
| 27 | 19.7B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 27 | 10.1B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 30 | 20.2B USD | 45 | 40 | |
| 31 | 21.0B AUD (≈$13.8B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 32 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 42 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score