Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Entergy Corporation
How Entergy Corporation stacks up
ETR · against 38 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 39 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including ETR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.5% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 9.5% | 6.1% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 37 reported | -1.6% | 2.3% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 0.4% | 3.0% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.21T INR (≈$26.5B) | 89 | 45 | |
| 2 | 43.2B USD | 89 | 54 | |
| 4 | 93.3B USD | 84 | 50 | |
| 5 | 58.7B USD | 80 | 39 | |
| 19 | 37.6B USD | 60 | 43 | |
| 21 | 30.5B USD | 57 | 45 | |
| 22 | 200.5B CNY (≈$28.1B) | 55 | 44 | |
| 23 | 70.7B USD | 54 | 40 | |
| 24 | 52.0B USD | 52 | 39 | |
| 25 | 46.9B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 26 | 49.2B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 27 | 3.12T INR (≈$37.4B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 28 | 2.41T INR (≈$29.0B) | 44 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score