Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ET · against 32 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #24 of 33 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ET · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 34 reported | 1.38× | 0.64× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 34 reported | 0.60 | 0.55 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 33 reported | 1.16× | 1.18× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 2 | 60.4B USD | 75 | 77 | |
| 3 | 83.6B USD | 70 | 41 | |
| 4 | 266.1B CNY (≈$37.3B) | 70 | 61 | |
| 5 | 89.1B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 20 | 110.5B USD | 32 | 61 | |
| 21 | 122.6B USD | 30 | 32 | |
| 22 | 81.0B USD | 27 | 47 | |
| 23 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 21 | 39 | |
| 24 | 69.4B USD | 21 | 49 | |
| 25 | 73.2B USD | 20 | 44 | |
| 26 | 120.0B USD | 17 | 62 | |
| 27 | 58.3B USD | 15 | 51 | |
| 28 | 58.0B USD | 14 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score