Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eversource Energy
How Eversource Energy stacks up
ES · against 57 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #14 of 58 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.9% vs peer median 8.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.1% vs peer median 0.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 5.6% | 4.8% | 72% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 9.1% | 7.7% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 0.9% | -4.4% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 62.9% | 48.5% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.6B USD | 93 | 57 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 91 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.7B) | 83 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 5 | 27.0B EUR (≈$29.7B) | 76 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2.41T INR (≈$29.0B) | 68 | 69 | |
| 9 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 68 | 64 | |
| 12 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 63 | 58 | |
| 12 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 63 | 55 | |
| 14 | 26.0B USD | 57 | 52 | |
| 15 | 44.4B EUR (≈$48.9B) | 55 | 51 | |
| 16 | 46.9B USD | 54 | 53 | |
| 17 | 179.3B DKK (≈$26.9B) | 53 | 53 | |
| 18 | 19.1B EUR (≈$21.0B) | 52 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score