Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EnerSys
How EnerSys stacks up
ENS · against 431 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #300 of 432 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score43 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ENS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ENS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ENS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 3.7% | 6.5% | 38% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 379 reported | 4.3% | 9.0% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 427 reported | 0.7% | 6.4% | 22% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ENS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 296 | 5.1B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 300 | 26.7B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 41 | 45 | |
| 300 | 8.6B USD | 41 | 41 | |
| 300 | 319.2B INR (≈$3.8B) | 41 | 61 | |
| 300 | 6.1B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 300 | 4.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 300 | 8.8B USD | 41 | 54 | |
| 300 | 4.3B USD | 41 | 35 | |
| 307 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 40 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score