Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENB · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 32 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ENB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ENB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 32 reported | 1.63× | 0.64× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 0.77 | 0.55 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 30 reported | 0.72× | 1.17× | 14% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 2 | 17.70T INR (≈$212.4B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 2 | 163.7B EUR (≈$180.1B) | 82 | 70 | |
| 4 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 5 | 173.5B USD | 76 | 65 | |
| 24 | 73.2B USD | 20 | 44 | |
| 25 | 120.0B USD | 17 | 62 | |
| 26 | 58.3B USD | 15 | 51 | |
| 27 | 58.0B USD | 14 | 48 | |
| 28 | 109.1B USD | 12 | 37 | |
| 29 | 66.1B USD | 10 | 45 | |
| 30 | 88.6B USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 31 | 64.0B USD | 3 | 37 | |
| 32 | 64.3B USD | 1 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score