Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LNG · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #397 of 399 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including LNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 2.43× | 0.49× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.06 | 0.48 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.87× | 1.37× | 22% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 393 | 476M USD | 2 | 2 | |
| 394 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.8B USD |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| 394 | 68M USD | 1 | 2 |
| 396 | 4.4B AUD (≈$2.9B) | 1 | 39 |
| 397 | 64.3B USD | 1 | 43 |
| 398 | 3.3B HKD (≈$427M) | 0 | 30 |
| 399 | 392M USD | 0 | 21 |