Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRGP · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #386 of 399 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TRGP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRGP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 5.16× | 0.49× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.72 | 0.48 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.77× | 1.37× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 382 | 4.3B USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 383 | 759M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 384 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 34 | |
| 385 | 1.5B USD | 4 | 49 | |
| 386 | 64.0B USD | 3 | 37 | |
| 387 | 1.8B USD | 3 | 46 | |
| 388 | 811M AUD (≈$535M) | 3 | 1 | |
| 389 | 9.2B USD | 3 | 39 | |
| 390 | 1.5B USD | 2 | 12 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score