Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Emerson Electric Co.
How Emerson Electric Co. stacks up
EMR · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #267 of 446 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score42 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including EMR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.0% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EMR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 4.8% | 8.4% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -2.0% | 9.2% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 7.6% | 5.2% | 62% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EMR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 261 | 17.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 261 | 119.2B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 261 | 5.1B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 261 | 25.6B USD | 51 | 50 | |
| 267 | 92.8B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 268 | 388M USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 268 | 2.0B USD | 49 | 66 | |
| 268 | 4.9B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 268 | 9.4B USD | 49 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score