Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ECPG · against 91 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #47 of 92 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including ECPG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ECPG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 82 reported | 3.88× | 0.50× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 97 reported | 1.31 | 0.70 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 85 reported | 11.38× | 2.61× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 2 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 4 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 1.5B USD | 96 | 74 | |
| 43 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 52 | 43 | |
| 44 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 55 | |
| 45 | 1.7B USD | 50 | ||
| 46 | 1.5B USD | 48 | ||
| 47 | 2.1B USD | 47 | 71 | |
| 48 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 49 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 44 | 79 | |
| 50 | 1.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 51 | 3.37T KRW (≈$2.4B) | 41 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score