Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ECPG · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #211 of 399 · scores higher than 47% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including ECPG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ECPG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 3.88× | 0.57× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 1.31 | 0.67 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 11.38× | 2.04× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 207 | 322M USD | 48 | 58 | |
| 208 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 21.7B THB (≈$607M) |
| 48 |
| 52 |
| 209 | 23.7B USD | 48 | 59 |
| 210 | 402M USD | 47 |
| 211 | 2.1B USD | 47 | 71 |
| 212 | 24.1B USD | 47 | 54 |
| 213 | 18.7B USD | 47 | 19 |
| 214 | 3.4B NOK (≈$320M) | 46 | 48 |
| 215 | 371M USD | 46 |